We're so anesthetized.
I've heard it attributed to agriculture, bureaucracy, religion, literacy, neurochemistry. Early Christian mystery cults and their predecessors went so far as to blame a malevolent, deluded god. Now everybody just blames television. I don't know where it comes from, but it seems to be something pretty fundamental to humanity. Is it unique to humanity? I don't know. I don't know, but it's there, and it's false.
I have moments when I see through it. Brief, brief, brief moments. Every time I do I try to hold on to them, and they just slip away. It could be because I'm trying, but I don't think so.
I just had a moment where I understood where I was. I understood that I was in my apartment, with my girlfriend. I understood her as she was, our relationship as it was. There were no profound revelations or insights, just clarity. For a moment I wasn't thinking about these things, assuming or remembering or acting out of habit. There was just absolute presence, no barriers to the reality of life.
I don't know if most other people have these moments or not, but I've had them for years. At least since I was a teenager, probably all of my life. They're somewhat rare, and usually they're horribly mundane. I most clearly remember back when I worked in retail, suddenly awakening and becoming acutely aware of the absolute, immediate reality that I was explaining the merits of this particular wicker chair to a customer.
I could never explain this thing to others, perhaps because I never quite understood it myself.
I think I may have recently found an analogy that's close to the mark: turn off your television. Look at it. It's an object, to which you are neutral, dispassionate. It's a thing, the same as your sofa or the wall. Turn it on. Turn it on to any station, I don't care -- static might even work. Sit there for a few minutes and attempt to watch the television. Not the program on the television. Attempt to look at the television as an object, just as you did when it was off. It's virtually impossible to avoid getting drawn in. It doesn't end there -- we don't even see the sound stages for what they are, the props for what they are, the actors for what they are... We understand the reality intellectually, but experientially we are hopelessly, hopelessly lost in the illusion.
That analogy is inadequate. It is a horribly loose approximation, arguably deceptively so, but it is the best example that I can articulate. That is how we live our lives. We intellectually understand the realities of our lives -- at least when circumstance presses the issue -- but we rarely if ever experience our lives. We're disconnected. Deluded. Anesthetized. Blinded. Sleeping. Deceived.
Look at the face of another human being. It can be your lifelong partner or an absolute stranger. Look at them, not as their name, not as their role, not as the outline you've become accustomed to, not as a human being at all, but as a creature. Look at them as a creature. Tell me they are not shockingly alien. The pores. The hairs. I don't even know how to describe what eyes look like.
I suspect that most "traditional" concepts of enlightenment -- Taoism, Buddhism, Gnosticism, etc. -- understand this reality and that transcending it is requisite. I think the early existentialists understood this, too. It didn't use to, but now it seems so obvious. Sartre wrote about experiences like these, and lord, if calling a field "existential phenomenology" isn't a hint, I don't know what is. Hell, maybe they didn't. Maybe they came no closer than a glimmer, no closer than I, I don't know. The transcendentalists? Indwelling God, the transparent eye-ball? Whatever, it's not exactly new ground. How could something so fundamental be so lost? How could we be so lost?
I think that some drugs grant brief access to this state. Even some mild ones, like marijuana. But if people experience this spontaneously, if they experience it under chemical influence, if it is central to many of the world's great religions and philosophies, even when contemporary books are being published on "The Power of Now," why still does it seem so rare? Why isn't there a common word for it?
Certainly, it is difficult to articulate, but most experiences are. Loose descriptions lead others to identify, and labels naturally arise. The cliched example is love, or color, but there are countless others. All experience is ultimately indescribable, and one can only point a finger to the proverbial moon. Why, then, should this one experience be such an exception? Why must we reinvent the wheel when we simply notice ourselves?
Of course, a label isn't going to help anyone experience it, but it's going to help them find direction when they do. Why should it take me the better part of three decades to recognize the universality inherent in my own lifelong experience? I'm really puzzled by it. As I sit here and type this, I don't know who will identify with it. Will everyone? Most everyone? Half? A few? Who's most likely to? My intellectual friends? My spiritual friends? My freak friends? I'm sure someone will, but then -- no, I'm not sure. I truly don't know. I just truly don't know.